Howard
J. Sewell
Are Seminars Worth
the Money?
(DM News, November 10, 1997)
Many
high-tech firms could be using other, more cost-effective
strategies
Seminars have become such a popular marketing tool for
high-tech companies that they're almost a corporate
rite of passage. One gets the suspicion that many product
seminars are held not because their sponsors think they're
such a terrific vehicle for generating leads, but because
they signal to the rest of the world that the company
has "arrived."
So many companies have jumped on the seminar bandwagon
the last few years, however, that the resulting glut
of events has caused seminar response rates to drop
significantly. That lower response, along with increases
in AV, travel and hotel expenses, is forcing many companies
to re-examine their seminar strategy and look instead
to other, more cost-effective forms of lead generation.
This article will attempt to provide some data to aid
in that comparison.
There are many reasons why seminars can seem like the
ideal marketing medium. The most obvious is that seminars
provide a sales force and/or channel partners the opportunity
to meet with prospects face-to-face. In fact, many companies
regard seminar programs as having a dual purpose: to
attract new prospects, and also to provide a venue for
existing prospects to see the product demonstrated live.
There's also the commonly held opinion that seminars
attract the "right" type of leads, those people interested
enough in the technology to spend half a day in a hotel
banquet room hearing about it.
Seminars have their downside, too. We've already mentioned
high cost and falling response rates. When we produce
seminar invitations and other lead generation campaigns
(those that offer a free white paper, information kit,
demo disk, video, etc.) for the same client, we usually
find that the latter programs generate twice the response
as their seminar counterparts.
Seminars have geographic limits. Even if your company
presents dozens of seminars in a year, chances are that
some metro areas will go untouched. In addition, some
potential prospects just never attend seminars, period.
That includes a great many people with management titles
who feel they simply can't invest the half-day most
seminars require.
At our agency, we maintain the theory that seminar respondents
are simply a subset of the people who respond to a well-crafted,
"free information"-type lead generation campaign. In
other words, the MIS manager willing to spend four hours
in a hotel banquet room isn't going to hesitate to receive
information on the same technology without leaving the
office.
The chart below compares the typical cost of a six-city
seminar tour (mailing 5,000 names per city) with that
of a 30,000 piece lead generation campaign. All assumptions
are rough and based on our experience - your costs and
response rates will vary. Direct mail costs for both
options are based on the identical format, a #10-size
package including a two-page cover letter, four-color
insert and business reply card.
|
Seminars |
Lead
Generation |
| Mailing
Quantity |
30,000 |
30,000 |
| Response
Rate |
1-1/2% |
3% |
| #
Leads |
450 |
900 |
| Direct
Mail Cost* |
$
40,000 |
$
40,000 |
| Event
Cost* |
$
60,000 |
-- |
| Fulfillment
Cost* |
-- |
$
19,000 |
| Total
Cost |
$100,000 |
$
59,000 |
| Cost
Per Lead |
$222 |
$65 |
| * Direct
mail cost includes creative, production, lists,
postage, and agency fees. Event cost includes travel,
AV, venue, food, collateral materials and agency
fees. Fulfillment cost includes the cost to create
an original 12-page white paper, along with the
cost of existing material and associated postage.
|
Based on these assumptions, the cost of a seminar lead
(not even allowing for the fact that as many as fifty
percent of those people won't even show up at the event)
is over three times the cost of those leads generated
by a non-seminar, information-type offer.
There are ways to cut seminar cost. One is to partner
with other companies and present joint events with hardware
and software partners, resellers and consulting firms.
In these cases, you'll have to decide whether the cost
savings are worth the reduced "podium time," and whether
the joint message muddies how you're trying to position
your product in the market.
Technology offers other options. Many companies are
experimenting successfully with seminars broadcast via
the World Wide Web. Prospects register for the event
in standard fashion (via phone, mail, fax or a company's
web site), download a special plug-in for their browser
that allows them to receive audio and video, and then
at the appointed time and date, log in to a specific
URL for the broadcast. Seminars can even be stored at
that same URL for future broadcast on demand.
As a marketing strategy, seminars won't disappear soon.
Many of today's high-tech products need a face-to-face,
"live" presentation to be properly appreciated. However,
the next time someone at your company says, "Let's do
a seminar," think carefully about your options. For
the same investment or less, you may be able to attract
the very same prospects and hundreds more like them.