March 2002
CULLING THE WEAK FROM YOUR CAMPAIGNS
There's a well-known Silicon Valley company that fires the
lowest-ranking ten percent of employees every six months. Though
we're not an advocate of this approach as HR policy, you can apply
the same aggressive posture to your direct marketing campaigns as
a way to improve effectiveness over time.
For example, when marketing to an in-house list of customers or
prospects, most companies mail or broadcast to the entire list and
measure results en masse. Instead, it makes more sense to code your
list based on demographics, lead source (where the person came
from), age (how long he or she has been in the database), etc. and
measure response accordingly. That way, you can determine not only
which segments are performing best, but also which groups may not
be worth your precious marketing dollars.
You may find that customers who bought from you more than two years
ago respond so poorly that they're not worth mailing to. Or that
prospects from trade shows are ignoring your e-mail newsletter.
Eliminating these groups from future programs will help increase
your marketing ROI by lowering cost and improving overall response.
When renting outside lists, split the names within each list based
on job title, company size, or other select criteria (this is known
as an A/B split) and then either code the names separately or send
each group to a unique URL. You may discover, for example, that
response from specific geographies, or companies of a certain size,
or certain job titles, falls well behind the pack and that you can
improve the effectiveness of future campaigns by deleting these
groups from the mix.