June 2006
THE RISKS OF GRAPHIC-INTENSIVE E-MAILS
Captaris (www.captaris.com) is a leading developer of Business
Information Delivery products and solutions. As part of an
ongoing series of e-mail campaigns for Captaris, we recently
executed a creative test that pitted a standard HTML design
(a design that had performed well in past campaigns for the
same client) against a more streamlined design devoid of
most HTML graphics.
The test was intended to gauge to what extent HTML graphics
have a positive or negative impact on e-mail response.
Below are links to creative for the two campaigns. First the
standard HTML version:
http://www.connectdirect.com/casestudies/captaris/email/control/
and the streamlined version:
http://www.connectdirect.com/casestudies/captaris/email/test/
The results were startling. Both performed at above-average
rates, but the test (streamlined) design generated an average
response 16% higher than the control, across an array of
different subject line tests. (The reason, we hypothesize,
is that HTML graphics prevent our message being seen at
first glance in the recipient's e-mail preview window. File
size may also play a role.)
A note for the direct marketing purists reading this: yes,
it's true that the copy in the test e-mail is shorter than
the control version, and therefore this wasn't a true test
in the scientific sense. The reason for this decision on
our part was the copy length in the control - if we had
attempted to fit every word within the streamlined design,
the result would have been awkward at best.
In the end, we opted for what we thought was a more
appropriate copy length for the new design, even though
we knew the test results would be compromised. Since we
changed two variables (copy and design) versus just one,
it's therefore possible that the shorter copy also contributed
to the higher response rate. Future campaigns will test
this theory.
Do these results mean we're abandoning HTML graphics entirely
for all e-mail campaigns? No, and neither should it suggest the
same for you and your e-marketing efforts. As ever, these results
were specific to one list and one campaign, and so the numbers
could conceivably vary in different circumstances.
However, they certainly should give you reason to at least
consider cutting back on the amount of HTML graphics in your
e-mails, particularly to in-house lists when you have more
flexibility to test creative without the cost penalties inherent
with rented files.